South Lake Union – Before, and Which After?
Last week we ran a story regarding the public meeting on March 28th which focused on the City of Seattle’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the South Lake Union Height Alternatives, outlining four Alternatives, or plans, for the future development of South Lake Union (planning for the next 25 years and beyond). The Draft EIS was compiled by the City’s Department of Planning and Development. We stayed for 35 minutes of the public commentary and during that time, most of the speakers advocated Alternative One, which offers the greatest height and density zoning.
You can hit this link, select the Draft EIS plan, then go to Section 3.10, Aesthethics, and see how all the Alternatives stack up visually. Draw your own conclusions as to what you think would be best for South Lake Union. Our attachment here only focuses on the Alternative 1 scenario, but it presents some compelling visions as to the full potential of SLU. slu alt 1 graphics print
How the Alternatives differ:
Alternative 1 – outlines the greatest potential for height and density increases for commercial and residential development
Alternative 2 – mid-point between Alternatives 1 and 3, it contains lesser height and density increases for commercial and residential development
Alternative 3 – provides the least potential for height and density increases, and only cover residential development
Alternative 4—“no action”, retaining existing zoning, and no height increase incentives
Finally, two things that all the Alternatives will share: it was stated during the March 28th meeting that there will be no changes to current shoreline designations, and that views to designated South Lake Union viewpoints would not be obstructed.
If you would like to read more about any of these Alternatives, please go to the full Draft EIS on this link. It’s 659 pages long, but the document is also broken out by sections. The DOPD engaged a number of consultants to help prepare the Draft EIS, and the Alternatives renderings shown here and in the Draft EIS were done by NBBJ, which worked on aesthetics, light/glare, shadows and viewshed for this project.
Finally, if you have comments or opinions, good or bad, about which Alternative to select– or about anything else covered in the Draft EIS, send an email to email@example.com no later than Monday, April 11. After that, the DOPD will commence work on a Final EIS, which should be finished this summer. We’ll let you know when that report is released.
Map: USGS, 1897– from the Draft EIS